Charlie's Angels - User Reviews

Thank you for rating this movie!

2.15 / 5

User rating: 2.15

Based on 1310 votes and 120 reviews


  • User rating: 2.15 24.38%
  • User rating: 2.15 3.32%
  • User rating: 2.15 1.39%
  • User rating: 2.15 4.71%
  • User rating: 2.15 66.20%



Please rate movie 1 to 5 stars






Type the code:


 

Showing 101 to 120 of 120

User review rating: 1 November 17, 2019

They look like 3 waitresses from Denny's. Hardly Angels, we kept waiting for the real angels to appear. Does Hollywood no longer hire attractive women ?

User review rating: 1 November 17, 2019

We watched this with an open mind. When the transgender "angel" removed its wig my brother looked a me a said, are they kidding. We walked out in disgust.

User review rating: 1 November 17, 2019

Here's how you make a watchable Charlie's Angels. Cast good looking Women !!! Hire Sofia Vegara, Blake Lively, and Mila Kunis. Now you have got a cast that will draw viewers like the Original did. Watching this just ruined the spirit of the concept. Even my wife said, doesn't anyone good looking live in Hollywood anymore ?

User review rating: 1 November 17, 2019

We walked out when the transvestite one removed it's wig

User review rating: 1 November 17, 2019

Worst film I have seen in my Life. A new low for Hollywood

User review rating: 5 November 16, 2019

The best film of 2019.

User review rating: 1 November 16, 2019

Painful to watch. Destroying the memories of what started as something sexy and beautiful more than 40 years ago. We got sick and walked out before the end, it was that bad. My brother went to customer service and demanded a refund, and got one.

User review rating: 4 November 16, 2019

Wholesome entertaining adventure/comedy movie. I enjoyed this movie and got a few laughs out of it too. Naomi did a great job of a smart programer but at the same time, a naive character portrayed in her role.

User review rating: 1 November 16, 2019

Recast the originals as a Golden Girls version, toss in some humor and you might get some audience. This was horrific nonsense.

User review rating: 1 November 16, 2019

8 million opening, and this is what they spent 100 million on? This will be the last CA movie. Stewart cannot act and whoever the other two are they should go back to waiting tables hoping for that break.

User review rating: 1 November 16, 2019

The trailer is absolutely sad, the movie made the trailer look good. if you want your morning dose of PC, SJW, man hating, guilt shaming, blame bagel, this is it.

User review rating: 1 November 16, 2019

How far off is this Movie ? From Farrah Fawcett, in the Original to a Bart Simpson look alike in this stinker.

User review rating: 1 November 16, 2019

Making this with Good Looking Women like the Original Series. You would get much better reviews. Why does every movie now have to have a trans/gender in it ?

User review rating: 1 November 16, 2019

9 reviews and only 1 - 5 star rating but they claim 66.67% of reviews give this movie 5 stars...… Math...Brain....Hurt

User review rating: 1 November 16, 2019

You know the quality of the movie when before it comes out the director/writer uses the Ghostbusters excuse if it bombs its because of sexism and discrimination...

User review rating: 1 November 15, 2019

It must be my age. I remember the Original Series and the Beautiful Women. The only thing this has in common is the name. When did Beautiful Women go out of style ? Bad Movie

User review rating: 1 November 15, 2019

Why does every remake have to contain a transgender actor. This is so old already. Make this with 3 WOMEN and give SJW the day off.

User review rating: 5 November 15, 2019

AWESOME

User review rating: 1 November 15, 2019

Bring back Lucy Liu!

User review rating: 2 November 13, 2019

Make an original, please. These remakes are getting old

  Change Location